Azavea aimed to democratize the process of “redistricting”: a process in which states redraw districts across the U.S. Redistricting has vast implications on various aspects of our country’s democracy, including representation, voting, and funding. To help make the process more transparent and accessible to the people whom it most affects, Azavea launched a refresh of a product it had first launched ten years ago: DistrictBuilder.
DistrictBuilder is a free and open source app that allows advocacy organizations, journalists, and concerned citizens to redraw districts in a user-friendly web application, thereby allowing them to make informed suggestions to politicians. As a part of the product redesign, I worked on a refresh of the existing brand, which had been designed during the first launch and was showing its age.
Understanding the redistricting space
Before I began taking a look at DistrictBuilder’s brand and visual design, I evaluated existing tools of a similar nature. My goal was to better understand how other products were marketing themselves, and what types of imagery, color, and symbology is common.
There were a few patterns I noticed. Unsurprisingly, most of the available brands use blue as a primary color, some leaning into the political colors of both red and blue.
Upon taking this project, I originally considered redesigning the mark. Ultimately, I realized that there was enough brand recognition of DistrictBuilder within this space that it made more sense to focus on making visual refinements to the existing mark and logotype.
All told, I made several key changes to the logo:
Introduced blue and red into the mark
Though political gerrymandering is a huge concern in redistricting, it is not the only consideration. Additionally, DistrictBuilder is currently only built for use in the United States but it is possible to expand its use to other countries that undergo the redistricting process. As a result, the original design team appears to decided against using U.S. flag colors in the logomark.
However, I felt strongly that this decision appears to hurt the brand more than it helps, as the colors lacked meaning. People tend to associate politics with redistricting and the census, and though DistrictBuilder is not politically aligned with either party, I felt that we could get this across through our messaging rather than the logo itself.
I also made the argument that if DistrictBuilder expands to other countries, we could change out the colors and create a sub-brand:
I retained the “builder” brick reference, and simply refined the shape by recreating it overtop of a grid. I also rounded the corners slightly to make it look more modern and less sharp on screens. Both of these changes also ensured that the mark looked consistent and legible at smaller sizes, which was not true of the previous mark.
New typeface and color palette
Finally, used the New Frank typeface for the logotype. New Frank has a large font family and has an understated design that I felt would offer DistrictBuilder more refinement than its previous logotype. I also developed a fuller color scheme for UI and collateral applications.
All of this was applied to the application and DistrictBuilder marketing website, the latter of which required a full overhaul. Working with my marketing colleagues, I focused on ensuring that this new web page would appeal to our target audience. Knowing that this is a niche web application, we also needed to explain how DistrictBuilder helps combat gerrymandering.
Create an account on DistrictBuilder to try out redrawing districts.